3 Publications
Next
3.1 Papers
Section Intro | Molecular modeling | Bioinformatics | docking | Methods and algorithms | Applications | Chronological list

3.1.6 Chronological list
Section Contents | ref 1 | ref 2 | ref 3 | ref 4 | ref 5 | ref 6 | ref 7 | ref 8 | ref 9 | ref 10 | ref 11 | ref 12 | ref 13 | ref 14 | ref 15 | ref 16 | ref 17 | ref 18 | ref 19 | ref 20 | ref 21 | ref 22 | ref 23 | ref 24 | ref 25 | ref 26 | ref 27 | ref 28 | ref 29 | ref 30 | ref 31 | ref 32 | ref 33 | ref 34 | ref 35 | ref 36 | ref 37 | ref 38 | ref 39 | ref 40 | ref 41 | ref 42 | ref 43 | ref 44 | ref 45 | ref 46 | ref 47 | ref 48 | ref 49 | ref 50 | ref 51 | ref 52 | ref 53 | ref 54 | ref 55 | ref 56 | ref 57 | ref 58 | ref 59 | ref 60 | ref 61 | ref 62 | ref 63 | ref 64 | ref 65 | ref 66 | ref 67 | ref 68 | ref 69 | ref 70 | ref 71 | ref 72 | ref 73 | ref 74 | ref 75 | ref 76 | ref 77 | ref 78 | ref 79 | ref 80 | ref 81 | ref 82 | ref 83 | in press

3.1.6.46 Abagyan, R., and Totrov, M. (1997). Contact Area Difference (CAD): A robust measure to evaluate accuracy of protein models. J. Mol. Biol., 268, 678-285

A simple unified measure to evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional atomic protein models is proposed. This measure is a normalized sum of absolute differences of residue-residue contact surface areas calculated for a reference structure and a model. It employs more rigorous quantitative evaluation of a contact than previously proposed contact count based measures. We argue that the contact area difference (CAD) number is a robust single measure to evaluate protein structure predictions in a wide range of model accuracies, from ab initio and threading models to models by homology, since it reflects both local secondary structure and packing geometry, is smooth, continuous and threshold-free, is not sensitive to typical crystallographic errors and ambiguities, adequately penalizes domain and/or secondary structure rearrangements and protein plasticity, and has consistent linear and matrix representations for more detailed analysis. The CAD quality of crystallographic structures, NMR structures, models by homology, and unfolded and misfolded structures is evaluated. It is shown that the CAD number discriminates between models better than Cartesian root-mean-square deviation (cRMSD). The source code of the program calculating the CAD measures is available from the authors.