2 Research
Next
2.4 Methods and Algorithms
Section Intro | Sequence alignment | protein modeling | Modeling by homology | electrostatics & solvation | Monte-Carlo simulations | contact area difference | full atom | molecular visualization | Molecular animations

2.4.6 Protein 3D model accuracy evaluation

The surface area of contact between the two residues i and j. Absolute differences between the Aij values for two different models are accumulated in the CAD number.

A simple unified measure to evaluate the accuracy of three-dimensional atomic protein models is proposed. This measure is a normalized sum of absolute differences of residue-residue contact surface areas calculated for a reference structure and a model. It employs more rigorous quantitative evaluation of a contact than previously proposed contact count based measures. We argue that the contact area difference (CAD) number is a robust single measure to evaluate protein structure predictions in a wide range of model accuracies, from ab initio and threading models to models by homology, since it reflects both local secondary structure and packing geometry, is smooth, continuous and threshold-free, is not sensitive to typical crystallographic errors and ambiguities, adequately penalizes domain and/or secondary structure rearrangements and protein plasticity, and has consistent linear and matrix representations for more detailed analysis. The CAD quality of crystallographic structures, NMR structures, models by homology, and unfolded and misfolded structures is evaluated. It is shown that the CAD number discriminates between models better than Cartesian root-mean-square deviation (cRMSD). The source code of the program calculating the CAD measures is available from the authors.

[J. Molecular Biology - 1997] [PDF]